Thursday, October 31, 2013

Crave giveaway: OtterBox Realtree Camo case for HTC One

Congrats to Ken W. of Tallahassee, Fla., for winning a Sonic Alert Sonic-connect 2 in last week's giveaway, and to Maher K. of Maple Grove, Minn., for winning a Grace Digital Ecoxbt Bluetooth speaker the week before that. This week's prize is for the HTC One owners out there.

HTC's new flagship smartphone has generated lots of buzz with its all-metal design and revamped, love-it-or-hate-it Sense user interface. CNET reviewer Brian Bennett calls the Android device "the fastest, most beautiful phone I've ever used," and if you're going to have a gorgeous phone, you're going to want gorgeous clothing for it. That's where our freebie comes in.

We're giving away a rugged OtterBox Defender Realtree Camo case with a built-in screen protector; damage defense from drops, bumps, shock, and impact; and a cool nature-inspired design that'll make it easy to blend in to your surroundings when you and your HTC One commune out in the woods.

Normally, this OtterBox case would cost you $59.95, but this is your chance to get one for free. How do you go about doing that? Well, like this:

  • Register as a CNET user. Go to the top of this page and hit the "Join CNET" link to start the registration process. If you're already registered, there's no need to register again.
  • Leave a comment below. You can leave whatever comment you want. If it's funny or insightful, it won't help you win, but we're trying to have fun here, so anything entertaining is appreciated.
  • Leave only one comment. You may enter for this specific giveaway only once. If you enter more than one comment, you will be automatically disqualified.
  • The winner will be chosen randomly. The winner will receive one (1) OtterBox Defender Series with Realtree Camo case for the HTC One, with a retail value of $59.95.
  • If you are chosen, you will be notified via e-mail. The winner must respond within three days of the end of the sweepstakes. If you do not respond within that period, another winner will be chosen.
  • Entries can be submitted until Monday, May 6, 12 p.m. ET.

And here's the disclaimer that our legal department said we had to include (sorry for the caps, but rules are rules):

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. YOU HAVE NOT YET WON. MUST BE LEGAL RESIDENT OF ONE OF THE 50 UNITED STATES OR D.C., 18 YEARS OLD OR AGE OF MAJORITY, WHICHEVER IS OLDER IN YOUR STATE OF RESIDENCE AT DATE OF ENTRY INTO SWEEPSTAKES. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, ALL U.S. TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS, AND WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW. Sweepstakes ends at 12 p.m. ET on Monday, May 6, 2013. See official rules for details.

Good luck.

Read More

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Ninja Ultima Blender BL810

My knowledge of actual ninjas is limited to obscure pop-culture references, but I generally think of them as being two things: quiet and lethal. The Ninja Ultima BL800 blender is hardly quiet, but as far as the other, if "lethal" means "ridiculously effective" in blender-speak, the Ninja is aptly named. It was a consistent top performer and kept pace with its more expensive competitors like the Vitamix 7500 and Blendtec Designer Series Wildside Blender, for half the price.

I own the Ninja Kitchen System 1100, which retails for $159. The 1100 features different accessories than the Ultima. For example, it comes with the standard, 72-ounce pitcher as well as a 40-ounce "processing bowl," which is identical to the main pitcher, only smaller. It also comes with a blade for each, as well as whisk, dough hook, and dough paddle attachments. The 800 only comes with one pitcher, but has a removable quad blade and two single-serve cups that hook directly onto the blender base for easy, quick smoothie making. My 1100 is a great blender and I've never had a problem, but I can admit to having blender envy. Afraid of having a subpar blender, I put the Vitamix on my Christmas list and begged my family to all pull together because it's all I wanted in the entire world. It made me resent my perfectly functional Ninja blender, thinking that while, yes, it could make my delicious smoothies, it could make them better if it was a Vitamix.

When we received these blenders to review, I couldn't help but feel drawn to the Vitamix. We decided that I should test the Ninja because I already had one. I fully expected the Ninja to underwhelm me next to the Vitamix. As testing progressed, however, I grew more and more surprised.

The $259.99 Ninja kept pace with the $529 Vitamix and the $454.95 Blendtec at almost every step. This is not to say that, if you already own a Vitamix or Blendtec, you should regret that decision. Both are excellent appliances that performed consistently well, but they also cost more than my monthly student loan payment.

All things considered, if you don't put your blender through a lot of rigorous tasks, you don't need a blender with this kind of power and will likely be perfectly content with the $39.99 Hamilton Beach Smoothie Smart (Model 56206). If, however, you want a blender that can slice its way through virtually any food as well as replace many small appliances in your home, including a meat grinder and food processor, the Ninja is an excellent value.

Design and features
With 1,500 watts, 2.5 horsepower, and a range of 3,700 to 24,000rpm, the Ninja Ultima is a powerhouse blender. It's loud, so as stated, the Ninja name is more about effectiveness than stealth.

The Ninja measures 18 inches high at its tallest point, with a countertop footprint that's 8 inches wide and 9.5 inches deep, comparable to the KitchenAid 5-Speed Diamond blender. My one complaint about the exterior is that the blender looks a lot larger than it is. While it is similarly sized as the KitchenAid and the other large blenders, it looks so much bulkier, perhaps because of its angular shape or tinted blender jug.

I appreciate the 72-ounce blender jar and how much capacity the machine has. To make this large pitcher even more functional, Ninja has a removable quad blade that reaches up the height of the blender. I love the quad blade, but I love even more that it's removable. This means that for large quantities of food, the additional blades make short work of the blending process, but for smaller tasks, the bottom blades are more than sufficient.

This brings me to my favorite aspect of the Ninja line of products, as I have experienced it both with this blender and my Ninja Kitchen System 1100 at home. Ninja likes to give you options. With the Ultima BL800, the Ninja gives you two 16-ounce, single-serving-size cups that hook directly onto the blender base via a blade lid. Once your smoothie or shake is blended, you trade this blade lid for a traditional to-go cup lid. I see a lot of potential for this feature. The Ninja made a smoothie in the to-go cup in five pulses. You could load the cup with your smoothie ingredients the night before, attach it to the blender base, and have breakfast and be out the door in seconds.

In addition to options, the Ninja offers ease of use. It doesn't have presets like the Blendtec or Breville Hemisphere Control Blender do, but what it lacks in presets, it makes up for in overall options. Like the Vitamix, the Ninja features a power dial and a switch which, if flipped up blends consistently and, if pressed down, pulses. This gives you total control over its power and function.

Usability
The Ninja Ultima is really easy to use, but it requires you to be a little more hands-on than other, comparably sized blenders. For example, you must lock the pitcher in place with a clockwise turn. Also, the blender won't start unless the lid is on the pitcher and secured by locking the handle downward. This may be a nuisance for some, but given the power and number of blades inside the Ninja, I appreciate it as a safety precaution.

The control panel feels responsive, and Ninja includes a guide for matching the power settings to a specific task, and whether or not to use the removable blade. This guide helpfully nudges you toward getting the most out of the Ninja's customization features and its various blend settings.

As with all blenders, cleaning is a great concern; how easy a blender is to clean may factor heavily into how much you actually use it. For example, my previous blender had a lot of parts that all required separate hand-washing, such as the pitcher, blade attachment, rubber seal, and lid components. Because it was such a hassle, I rarely used it.

Blenders are better now. Most, including the Ninja, feature attached blades and instruct you to fill the pitcher halfway with warm water and a few drops of dish soap and then to run the blender on a lower speed for ten or so seconds to clean it. Rinsing and air-drying is the most time-consuming part of this very, very simple method. This is also true for the single-serve cups, making them even more convenient. The Ninja's pitcher and cups are also top-rack dishwasher-safe. The lids and removable blade will need to be hand-washed. Given this, I would stick to the first method.

The Ninja is a formidable machine and, naturally, merits caution when you interact with its blades. Taking out the quad blade to clean it might be intimidating for some people, but of course if the blade was fixed, hand cleaning would be terrifying. Exercise caution around the blades and the Ninja should cause you no more safety concerns than any other high-power blender.

Performance
While I'm really excited about the Ninja's features and options, what I care most about is its performance. It did not disappoint. As I said, the Ninja performed on par with the Vitamix and Blentec, but also with the equally priced Breville. Performance is what truly drew me away from desperately saving pennies for a Vitamix and convinced me that my Ninja blender is as good, especially for the price.

Read More

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Apple iPad Air

It̢۪s been a long time since Apple delivered unto us a proper redesign of the iPad. The original, boxy, first-gen tablet lived for about 11 months, replaced in 2011 by a far slinkier version. The tapered design language survived, more or less unchanged, for a further 2.5 years -- a lifetime in the consumer electronics world. That period was punctuated by two updates, bringing faster chips and a better display, but it̢۪s a full refresh we̢۪ve all been waiting for, something to make the good ol' iPad look and feel truly new.

And here it is: the iPad Air. With this, the fifth generation of the iPad line, Apple has delivered a proper exterior redesign, crafting a substantially thinner and lighter tablet that finally eliminates the chunky bezels handed down since the first generation -- at least on the left and right. But, despite this significant exterior reduction, the iPad Air maintains the battery life of its predecessor and offers significantly better performance.

The Air is a tangible upgrade over the previous, fourth-generation iPad, no longer in production and so banished to the annals of history. The new iPad slots right in where its predecessor left off, priced at $499 for a lowly 16GB, $599 for 32GB, $699 for 64GB, and $799 for the maximum 128GB configuration. Cellular models -- with LTE and support for AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon in the United States -- cost an additional $130 beyond the above prices.

So, yes, it̢۪s still very much the premium-priced choice, just as it̢۪s always been. However, the market continues to shift, offering more and increasingly sophisticated alternatives at far cheaper prices, tablets like the Kindle Fire HDX and Google Nexus 10. That, plus strong competition from within Apple̢۪s own ranks with the upcoming iPad Mini with Retina Display , means the iPad Air has to be better than ever. Thankfully, it is.

From left: The original iPad Mini, iPad Air, and fourth-generation iPad

(Credit: CNET)

Design
Last year̢۪s iPad Mini introduced a fresh new design, taking cues from the latest iPod Touch to create a high-end tablet in an impossibly slender form factor. You could think of the iPad Air as a 20 percent scaled-up version of the Mini, as the two tablets feature near-identical styling details, the bigger one differing only by having more speaker holes on the bottom (80 vs. 56 on the Mini).

Impressively, though, the iPad Air isn̢۪t 20 percent thicker than the Mini. In fact, at 7.5mm, it̢۪s only 0.3mm deeper -- a massive 1.9mm thinner than the previous full-size iPad. Despite that, the tablet feels just as sturdy and rigid as before, not flexing a bit even under rather aggressive attempts at twisting.

It̢۪s light, too, weighing just 1 pound in Wi-Fi-only guise. That̢۪s 0.4 pound lighter than the previous generation and 0.3 pound heavier than the Mini. In other words, the iPad Air̢۪s weight is actually closer to the Mini than to its fourth-gen predecessor. Indeed, pick up an Air and you̢۪ll be reminded of the first time you held a Mini. It̢۪s a "wow" moment.

We were big fans of the Mini last year, and we̢۪re big fans of how the Air looks and feels now. The more rounded profile and chamfered edges give it a modern presence, while the new shape means the buttons and toggle switch situated around the upper-right corner are much easier to find than before.

Stereo speakers flank the Lightning connector on the bottom, placement that makes them far less likely to be obscured by your hand than the previous-gen iPad̢۪s famously mediocre single output. They̢۪re also far louder. However, we can̢۪t help but wish Apple had positioned the left channel speaker on the top, to allow for proper stereo separation when held in portrait orientation while watching a movie. As it is, you̢۪ll hear everything on the right.

Our only other design complaint is the missing Touch ID. This is Apple̢۪s term for the fingerprint scanner built into the Home button on the iPhone 5S. It allows you to unlock your device without typing in a numeric code, also making iTunes purchases password-free and, therefore, infinitely less annoying.

Apple iPad Air 9.7 inches 4:3 2,048x1,536
Apple iPad 4 9.7 inches 4:3 2,048x1,536
Apple iPad Mini with Retina Display 7.9 inches 4:3 2,048x1,536
Microsoft Surface 2 10.6 inches 16:9 1,920x1,080
Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 8.9 inches 16:10 2,560x1,600
Asus Transformer Pad TF701 10.1 inches 16:10 2,560x1,600
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 edition 10.1 inches 16:10 2,560x1,600

The goal of Touch ID is to make unlocking your phone so easy that everyone enables proper security. Most iPhone 5S users will agree that it succeeds in that regard, so much so that many will find themselves trying to unlock the iPad Air by holding a finger on the Home button and waiting impatiently. That, of course, doesn̢۪t work. We appreciate that most iPads rarely leave the home, so security is less of a concern, but the convenience of not having to type in your iTunes password with every app download is more than enough to leave you longing for Touch ID here. It is a frustrating omission, reminiscent of Siri̢۪s initial iPhone 4S exclusivity. Future iPad generations will surely make this right, perhaps beginning with an iPad Pro.

A7 power
When the fourth-generation iPad rolled out, it contained a custom version of the iPhone 5̢۪s A6 processor called the A6X, offering quad-core performance versus the other's dual-core. For the new generation, Apple seemingly decided that two was enough, and so what we have here is the same dual-core, 64-bit A7 CPU found in the iPhone 5S. Disappointed? Don̢۪t be. The iPad Air is ridiculously fast. Interestingly, it̢۪s slightly faster even than the latest iPhone, which also has the same amount of RAM (1GB). Apple seemingly turned the wick up a bit here, with Geekbench indicating a processor speed of 1.39GHz, versus the 1.29GHz on the iPhone 5S.

We coached the iPad Air through some of our favorite benchmarks, along with a fourth-gen iPad running the most recent version of iOS (7.0.3). The results were quite compelling. In Sunspider 1.0.1, the old iPad took 661ms on average to complete the tests, whereas the new Air blasted through in 402ms average. That̢۪s a greater than 50 percent improvement in Web rendering speed. (The iPhone 5S scored 417ms.) Geekbench 2 was similarly improved, 1,797 vs. 2,382 (higher is better here), and on Geekbench 3 the gap widened, 1,429 vs. 2,688. In fact, the iPad Air̢۪s single-core score of 1,475 is higher than the dual-core score of the fourth-generation iPad.

In case you̢۪re wondering, yes, the iPad Air does get quite warm when doing this sort of number crunching. The back of the tablet feels slightly cooler at full-tilt than its finger-toasting predecessor, but there̢۪s still plenty of heat coming off the back, reinforcement that your slinky new tablet is, indeed, working hard.

Of course, nobody cares about numbers if the experience doesn̢۪t back that up, and it does -- though perhaps not to that same degree. Apps load noticeably faster, particularly big games, where you̢۪ll be able to jump into and out of levels far more quickly. Additionally, we noticed slightly higher frame rates in some games, though that was far less prevalent. We̢۪d anticipate this becoming a far more common thing once more titles become optimized for the 64-bit A7 CPU.

Apple iPad Air 1 pound (Wi-Fi); 1.05 pounds (cellular) 6.6 inches 9.4 inches 0.29 inch
Apple iPad 4 1.44 pounds (Wi-Fi); 1.46 pounds (cellular) 7.3 inches 9.5 inches 0.37 inch
Apple iPad Mini with Retina Display 0.68 pound (Wi-Fi); 0.69 pound (cellular) 5.3 inches 7.9 inches 0.28 inch
Microsoft Surface 2 1.49 pounds 6.8 inches 10.8 inches 0.35 inch
Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 1.25 pounds 6.4 inches 9.4 inches 0.35 inch
Asus Transformer Pad TF701 1.29 pounds 7.1 inches 10.4 inches 0.35 inch
Samsung Galaxy 10.1 (2014) 1.19 pounds (Wi-Fi); 1.21 pounds (cellular) 6.7 inches 9.6 inches 0.31 inch
Read More

Temple Run: Oz (iOS)

Temple Run Oz (iOS | Android) is another movie-themed version of the mega-popular running game, but just like Temple Run Brave, the developers managed to add enough original content to make it worth your money.

In Temple Run Oz, you play as Oz while attempting to outrun the evil flying baboons from "Oz the Great and Powerful." Like Temple Run 2, you'll need to swipe to jump, turn, and slide under obstacles and you can tilt to move Oz from side to side on the path. But with this themed remake, the scenery has been completely redesigned to fit in with the movie, and there are new game elements you'll have to tackle in order to survive as long as possible. In other words, you're not just getting an older game with a new "skin"; Temple Run Oz uses the same core gameplay, but adds plenty to make the game unique on its own.

You start out in a lush forest, but you'll journey through several different worlds with unique obstacles as you run. You'll run through graveyards, magical forest settings, and balance precariously atop walls as you progress. But a strange thing I encountered was that when you're approaching a new world, a sign is shown on the path, then a progress bar appears and runs at the top as though the new level is loading. It wouldn't be a big deal, but in my testing, the progress bar only served as another distraction and I wondered why it needed to be on the screen at all. Whatever the reason, when the progress bar is up, you'll travel through a time-warp tunnel, then enter the new world on the other side.

As with all the Temple Run games, you'll collect coins as you run that can be used to buy power-ups, but some interesting mini-games within Temple Run Oz give you the opportunity to collect much more. The best of them occurs when occasionally you'll see Oz's iconic hot air balloon pass in front of your path, and if you go in the direction of the balloon, you'll be able to fly high over the surface. Up in the air, you can tilt to steer around giant obstacles while you collect long strings of coins that add up more quickly than they would on the ground. It's certainly not a ground-breaking mini-game, but makes for a nice break in the action and lets you fill up your coin supply.

As is usual in many games these days, you have the ability to pay real money to add to your coins so you can buy every upgrade you want. I find that grinding it out the old-fashioned way is more fun, but it's worthy of note that the option is there for you.

Overall, Temple Run Oz is enough of a departure from the original to warrant spending your 99 cents. Anyone who likes endless runners or who has enjoyed Temple Run games in the past should check out this game for the new worlds, obstacles, and mini-games.

Read More

Monday, October 28, 2013

Classics Corner: Citroen AX GT

Choosing the first car to feature on this dusty and shadowy part of XCAR was always going to be a challenge. With the preamble out of the way, which car would get the ultimate accolade of coming first? It could have been a super-luxurious German barge. Or a sleek Japanese sports car loaded with techno wizardry. It could even have been an Italian supercar. Actually, no it wouldn't, as that's way off brief.

But instead, common sense prevailed and the star of the show is a French featherweight from the late '80s. Mesdames et Messieurs, presenting the Citroën AX GT.

It's funny, for a car that's held in such high esteem, the AX GT really has fallen from grace. Mention the MK2 Golf GTi or the Peugeot 205 GTi and people will regale you with tales of B-road jollity. These cars are, quite rightly, held in high esteem and command prices to match.

But the AX GT creates a different response. The praise is still there, but it tends to follow, "Oh goodness, I'd forgotten about them." This probably explains why you can pick up a good AX GT for less than £1,000. Try finding a similar condition 205 GTi and you'll end up spending a lot more.

People will invariably comment on the AX GT's build quality -- or lack thereof. It's fair to say that had Citroën made it out of tin foil and papier-mâché the build quality would have been improved. But perversely, the AX GT's frailty is actually its biggest strength. At 710 kg, the little Citroën weighs about the same as a Lotus Elise.

The other headline figures don't present a particularly compelling sales pitch for the AX. A top speed of 112 mph, and a zero to 60 mph time of 8.8 seconds aren't all that great, even with the additional 'dazzling' and 'zippy' superlatives rolled out by Citroën at the time. But to write the AX off (always a phrase used with caution when describing this car), would be a monumental error.

The AX GT is one of the most engaging and involving cars you'll ever drive. It's a car completely devoid of safety features and electronic gizmos, so there's very little between you and the road. The steering is unassisted, providing levels of feedback that are non-existent on the majority of new cars. And because of its tiny dimensions, you always get the impression you're going faster than you actually are.

The 1.4-litre carburetted engine produces just 85 bhp, but in a car that weighs little more than a bag of frozen peas, it's more than ample. The AX GT is a delightful car to thread through a series of twisties. The small 14-inch wheels deliver a distinctly old school approach to cornering, with some proper lift-off oversteer available if desired. This probably explains why there's so few left. Spend a few moments scouring the hedgerows of Britain and you're likely to find an old AX covered in brambles. Check between the 205 and Renault 5 GT Turbo you'll inevitably find there whilst searching.

There's further good news when it comes to running an AX GT. Not only are they ridiculously cheap to buy, but they won't cost a bomb to insure either. What's more, the 1.4-litre engine means that road tax is cheaper and a decent set of tyres will cost you less than a good night out at the pub. Oh, and its simplicity means that you can look after it at home.

Today there are less than 80 AX GT's on Britain's roads, and they're becoming an increasingly rare sight. If you can find one that hasn't been 'Saxoed-up' or treated to the contents of the bargains section in Halfords, snap it up. With dwindling numbers and prices as low as they'll ever get, you may be glad you did.

Still want that 205 or Golf?

Read More

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Qualcomm: Microsoft's Surface 2 can't compare to Nokia's Windows tablet

The Nokia Lumia 2520 runs Windows RT and uses a Qualcomm processor.

(Credit: Andrew Hoyle/CNET)
Nokia's new Windows RT tablet turns the Finnish handset maker into Microsoft's rival, but at least one Nokia partner says there's really no competition.

Nokia earlier this week unveiled the Lumia 2520, the company's first tablet and the second current device in the market to run Windows RT. The other is Microsoft's Surface 2. Microsoft is in the process of buying Nokia, and the product release puts the two in an awkward position.

But executives at chipmaker Qualcomm say Nokia's tablet has a clear advantage over the Surface 2 in everything from processor speed to graphics, video playback, and wireless connectivity.

"The performance on [the 2520] is brilliant," Raj Talluri, senior vice president of product management for Qualcomm's application processors, told CNET. "It's really at the next level. It's not even really a contest [compared to Surface 2] ... In every area, it's much bigger, faster, and lower power."

Of course Talluri is biased -- Qualcomm provided the processor for Nokia's device while Nvidia made the Surface 2 chip. But in terms of sheer speeds and feeds, the Lumia 2520 does have some things to offer beyond the Surface 2. For processors, Microsoft's tablet houses a 1.7GHz Nvidia Tegra 4, whereas Nokia went with a 2.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 for the Lumia 2520. As CNET noted Thursday, the 2520 seems poised to be a more capable gaming machine than the Surface 2.

Talluri and Stephen Horton, a Qualcomm executive who works on product management for tablets and other computing devices, said Microsoft largely went with an Nvidia chip for Surface 2 because of timing.

"Let's put it this way," Horton said. "They're buying the company that did [the Lumia 2520] device. They clearly are very excited about it."

Microsoft and Nvidia declined to comment.

There will be no clear winner, however, until consumers vote with their wallets. Up to this point, few have chosen Windows RT products.

Windows RT is the first version of the operating system that runs on low-power chips normally used for cell phones. Those include processors from Qualcomm and Nvidia based on ARM Holdings technology. Making Windows compatible with such processors was Microsoft's attempt to better address the mobile market, an area where it has traditionally struggled. The lower-power chips allow thinner and lighter designs.

The Microsoft Surface 2 uses an Nvidia chip, much like the first version of the tablet.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)
However, Windows RT has some big drawbacks compared with Windows 8. For one, it's not compatible with many older applications, including iTunes. Few companies have introduced products running the operating system. Dell, Samsung, Toshiba, and Hewlett-Packard are several who dropped their Windows RT plans.

"We have a longer term view on these things," Talluri said. "The RT of today may not be the RT of tomorrow. But the vision of a device that's both your entertainment and productivity device that you want to carry with you is going to be there. We invest for the longer term."

In smartphones, meanwhile, Qualcomm is the undisputed king. It either provides the wireless chips, such as 4G LTE, or the application processor in most major devices on the market, including the iPhone 5S and Galaxy S4. It also is the chip provider for Windows Phones, partnering closely with Nokia over the years. However, Qualcomm has lagged rivals when it comes to tablets. That recently has started to change, with Qualcomm providing chips for recent hot tablets such as the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 7 and the Google Nexus 7.

Qualcomm said partners are working on more than 40 tablets using its processor that should hit the market within the next year. A big reason companies are choosing Qualcomm chips is the ability to support high screen resolutions, Talluri said, and many who work with Qualcomm on smartphones find it easy to shift to tablets with the chipmaker.

"Once you make the phone, it's an easy step to make a great tablet because you've already done the hard work and the same processor can support both," Talluri said.

And Horton pointed out that the first Android devices, such as the T-Mobile G1, also were panned.

"Google and Microsoft are very capable organizations, [with] lots of technologies," Horton said. Microsoft "didn't hit a home run out of the gate on the very first product, but they're working on it."

Zack Whittaker contributed to this report.
Read More

DC protestors stand with Snowden to fight surveillance

Saturday's Stop Watching Us rally in the US capital attracted a slew of people concerned by the National Security Agency's mass surveillance programs and featured an appearance -- in words anyway -- by Edward Snowden, whose massive leak of agency documents touched off the current debate about national security and civil liberties.

"This is about the unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral actions of the modern-day surveillance state and how we all must work together to remind government to stop them," Snowden said in a statement read by Justice Department whistle-blower Jesselyn Raddack. "It's about our right to know, to associate freely, and to live in an open society."

Snowden continued with a warning to lawmakers: "We declare that mass surveillance has no place in this country...It is time for reform. Elections are coming and we're watching you."

The rally was backed by a coalition of more than 100 companies and advocacy groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as individuals, such as Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee and Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian.

Speakers at the event included Congressman Justin Amash (R- Mich.); earlier NSA whistle-blower Thomas Drake; author Naomi Wolf; security specialist Bruce Schneier; and Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico and 2012 Libertarian party candidate for president; among others.

USA Today reported that thousands of people showed up for the demonstration and march, which moved from Washington, DC's Union Station to the Capitol Building. And the UK's Guardian newspaper, which has published many of the revelations drawn from the trove of Snowden documents, characterized the crowd as "featuring groups from the left and right of the political spectrum." (At one point Wolf found time to tweet, "I thanked a DC police officer for his service along the rally route and am so pleased he said thank you for being here, meaning all of us.")

The NSA, of course, defends its surveillance by saying it's essential in the fight against terrorism and for keeping an eye on foreign rivals.

Click the headline below to check out a selection of photos that participants in the demonstration posted to Twitter during the event.

We also have a Q&A with the rally's lead organizer, Rainey Reitman, activism director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and here's the complete Snowden statement that was read at the rally:

In the last four months, we've learned a lot about our government. We've learned that the US Intelligence Community secretly built a system of pervasive surveillance.

Today, no telephone in America makes a call without leaving a record with the NSA. Today, no Internet transaction enters or leaves America without passing through the NSA's hands. Our representatives in Congress tell us this is not surveillance. They're wrong.

We've also learned this isn't about red or blue party lines. Neither is it about terrorism.

It is about power, control, and trust in government; about whether you have a voice in our democracy or decisions are made for you rather than with you. We're here to remind our government officials that they are public servants, not private investigators.

This is about the unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral actions of the modern-day surveillance state and how we all must work together to remind government to stop them. It's about our right to know, to associate freely, and to live in an open society.

We are witnessing an American moment in which ordinary people from high schools to high office stand up to oppose a dangerous trend in government.

We are told that what is unconstitutional is not illegal, but we will not be fooled. We have not forgotten that the Fourth Amendment in our Bill of Rights prohibits government not only from searching our personal effects without a warrant but from seizing them in the first place.

Holding to this principle, we declare that mass surveillance has no place in this country.

It is time for reform. Elections are coming and we're watching you.

Read More

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Billion-dollar babies: Far-out pet projects of the tech elite

If you had as much money as Larry Ellison, you too could hold a gigantic sailing trophy over your head.

(Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

The amount of wealth concentrated in Silicon Valley and the greater technology industry offers no small amount of conspicuous consumption: owning a fleet of private jets, maintaining extravagant estates, and throwing parties with live tigers.

The industry's wealthiest company founders and CEOs have so much money that each day offers a new invitation to chase their wildest dreams and indulge, from flying catamarans to building floating cities. Consider this: Thanks to a surge in Google stock, co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin made roughly $3 billion each in 24 hours last week.

They aren't alone. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has seen his personal fortune balloon as the social network's stock has soared more than 70 percent in the last two months, while Elon Musk has watched his Tesla Motors shares jump from $24 to as high as $194 in just one year. Amazon may not be churning out profits -- in fact, it loses money each year -- but its share price has jumped 150 percent since 2010, boding well for the personal fortune of CEO Jeff Bezos.

Share the wealth? That demand doesn't fare much better among the tech elite than it does on Wall Street. And running a company -- or two, as in the case of Musk, CEO of both Tesla and SpaceX -- involves enough work to prevent even the most adept multitasker from impacting the world much beyond what his or her company does on a daily basis. After all, Bill Gates had to step down from Microsoft to turn his philanthropic foundation into an industry trailblazer.

To their credit, for every silly-sounding idea a tech titan throws money at, it's easy to find a donation, foundation, or moon-shot project that affects the world positively. Take Page's insistence that Google X focus on self-driving cars and balloon-delivered Internet and his establishment of the Global Impact Awards; Brin's investments in researching Parkinson's disease and lab-grown meat that addresses sustainability and animal welfare; or Zuckerberg's $100 million public education donation and billion-dollar charitable fund aimed at health and education advancements.

Still, a well-timed gift of cash or a fascination with select scientific causes can never blur out the more questionable splurges, the ones that turn tech industry leaders into billionaire caricatures. We've rounded up the expensive toys and far-out investments of six of the brightest and richest in tech who, despite their smarts, can't seem to stay away from those wacky desires to live forever, colonize other planets, and recreate the plot line of "Deep Impact," minus the apocalypse.

Elon Musk's transformable James Bond submarine with Tesla parts

The Lotus Esprit is a working submarine used in the 1979 James Bond film "The Spy Who Loved Me." It doesn't convert into an actual road vehicle, but Elon Musk -- who bought the prop at action for nearly $1 million -- is going to give it the old college try.

(Credit: RM Auctions)

When he's not launching SpaceX rockets that can move laterally and land themselves or planning an 80,000-person Mars colony, Musk chases his childhood dreams with cash on hand. But unlike the rest of us who don't run two huge tech companies after cashing out of PayPal, those dreams involved hatching ideas more akin to a mad scientist's.

One of those boyhood fascinations lies with James Bond. Indulging in that meant buying a Lotus Esprit submarine from the 1979 film "The Spy Who Loved Me" for close to $1 million. It won't just sit in his garage either; Musk hopes to make it a true land-and-sea spy car.

"It was amazing as a little kid in South Africa to watch James Bond in 'The Spy Who Loved Me' drive his Lotus Esprit off a pier, press a button and have it transform into a submarine underwater. I was disappointed to learn that it can't actually transform," Musk said in a statement following the revelation that he was the secret buyer of the spy mobile. "What I'm going to do is upgrade it with a Tesla electric powertrain and try to make it transform for real."

No small feat. But we're inclined to say (and we're not alone) that if anyone can do it, it's Musk.

Larry Page and Eric Schmidt back asteroid mining in the name of ... money

An artist's rendition of how absolutely not dangerous this concept is.

(Credit: Planetary Resources)

When you team up with James Cameron to turn a plot point of "Avatar" into reality, you know you're dealing with a really crazy idea. Surprisingly, mining rocket fuel and valuable minerals from asteroids has a small industry behind it and Google CEO Larry Page and Chairman Eric Schmidt teamed up with the "Titanic" director to back one of its key players, Planetary Resources. The goal is to achieve asteroid mining by 2020.

After incorporating planet mining into his blockbuster 3D sci-fi film, Cameron apparently became interested in the idea of turning to space for natural resources. As for Page and Schmidt's involvement, the two seem to simply like the idea of bankrolling something that was once exclusively a science fiction concept; neither have spoken publicly about their interest in the idea. The basic concept is akin to a gas station in space, and would add "trillions to the global GDP," Planetary Resources claims.

"We're in this for decades. But it's not a charity. And we'll make money from the beginning," Eric Anderson, a NASA veteran and Planetary Resources co-founder, said at the time of the announcement. Everyone already knew that, but it was nice of him to point out that the idea is a basically a money-printing scheme that piggybacks off the the wow factor of real world companies tackling futuristic concepts.

Sure, Page has done his fair share to promote the advancement of alternative energy here on Earth with the Google.org initiative. But asteroid mining, without any regard for how it would fit into the current economic ecosystem for natural resources, falls a little on the far side of the rich wanting to get richer.

"We're out working in that field, to really open up the solar system for business," Anderson told Space.com. Because the final frontier in space is, of course, corporations.

Jeff Bezos' space tourism dreams and his 10,000-year clock

If all goes according to plan, this 10,000-year clock will keep ticking long enough for Jeff Bezos to purchase immortality.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET)

Like many of his fellow tech industry chieftains, Amazon's Jeff Bezos likes space. So much so that he sent gear 14,000 feet underwater to retrieve one of the F-1 engines that powered Apollo 11 on its trip to the moon.

He also founded Blue Origin in 2000 to make space travel more affordable. When we say affordable, we mean for the well-heeled class of people that will actually be able to purchase tickets to space in the next 10 to 20 years. Still, Bezos is intent on making space tourism an industry, and he spent his high school years envisioning a future in which he could build space hotels and amusement parks for millions of orbiting Earthlings.

However, the plan isn't going as great as the one he hatched to become the Walmart of the Internet. In 2011, an unmanned Blue Origin rocket exploded in Texas, and the company has yet to produce a spacecraft that could meet the safety standards that would clear it for human flight and dock with the International Space Station.

Blue Origin also happens to be in a heated dispute with SpaceX and Elon Musk over the leasing of NASA's Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center, prompting Musk to compare Blue Origin showing up with a reliable spacecraft in five years to finding "unicorns dancing in the flame duct."

But Bezos isn't one to back down from a wild idea, like constructing a 10,000-year clock that will sit inside a Texas mountain and keep time for millennia. Bezos paid the Long Now Foundation $42 million to make the project happen, presumably so future generations of smugglers who strip the titanium and quartz construction for its metals in the year 3206 can thank the Amazon overlord for his contribution to the resource-deprived remnants of the US. That, or he likes clocks. 

"In the year 4000, you'll go see this clock and you'll wonder, 'Why on Earth did they build this?'" he told Wired magazine in 2011. And he's right. They really will wonder that.

Larry Ellison buys the sixth largest island of Hawaii and one of its airlines

The island Oracle's Larry Ellison bought for $500 million came with a complimentary Four Seasons Hotel.

(Credit: Four Seasons)

Where does one even start with Oracle's Larry Ellison, the US's third-richest man?

The world seemed to forget that Ellison turned the America's Cup competition into a financial arms race that narrowed it down to the only four competitors that could afford to build its mandated 130-foot-tall flying catamarans, a sailboat design that would wind up getting one British man killed during training.

Why? Because Team Oracle's amazing come-from-behind victory -- achieved in part thanks to a setback imposed on Ellison's team for cheating -- was a sporting marvel. Forget the fact that Emirates Team New Zealand fruitlessly spent about $100 million, and Ellison likely more than that, though he won't say.

Still, it's not the most ridiculous expenditure in the 69-year-old billionaire's history. In June of last year, Ellison completed his purchase of Lanai, the sixth largest island in Hawaii, for more than $500 million. It goes well with his $200 million home modeled on a 16th century Japanese imperial palace, and would have gone great with the 454-foot yacht he used to own that came equipped with a wine cellar and basketball court. Ellison sold that modest vessel for roughly $300 million to music mogul David Geffen.

Following the island purchase, Ellison bought one of Hawaii's airlines, because why not.

The Oracle founder is perhaps the easiest target among the tech billionaires primarily because he spends his so stereotypically for a self-indulgent and recurring member on Forbes' wealthiest list. To be fair, Ellison did sign Warren Buffet's Giving Pledge, an initiative to get the world's richest men and women to donate half or more of their wealth.

On the site, Ellison claims to have pledged years ago to give away 95 percent of his money to charity. Luckily, that would still leaves him with about $1.8 billion.

Peter Thiel wants to live forever

Imagine the number of Facebooks you could invest in if you lived to be 150.

(Credit: Araya Diaz/Getty Images for TechCrunch)

When it comes to Paypal mafia member Peter Thiel, it's hard to overlook his investment in the Seasteading Institute, a proposed society on the water that would aim to "test new ideas in government," presumably of the libertarian variety considering Thiel's public distaste in government meddling.

The idea has been catching on more and more of late, as Silicon Valley adopts an aggressive persecution complex akin to that of Wall Street's and increasingly discusses the merits of a secessionist movement toward proposed techno utopias.

Though more eye-catching than a floating city, if you can believe it, is Thiel's intent on funding research into anti-aging processes. Because why worry about improving the health of those less fortunate than yourself when you can simply prevent death for the wealthy?

Thiel kicked off his search for youth with a $3.5 million gift to Cambridge's anti-aging researcher Aubrey de Grey. Since then, Thiel's Founders Fund, the very same that pays kids not to go to college, has invested in about 14 companies whose focus involves anti-aging and life extension solutions.

"Probably the most extreme form of inequality is between people who are alive and people who are dead," Thiel told The New Yorker for a profile piece the magazine published in 2011. See, he's fighting to end inequality. It all makes sense now.

Read More

2014 Acura MDX Advance SH-AWD

As much as we'd like for every car that we review to be as exciting as the Jaguar F-Type that recently graced the Car Tech garage, the reality is that most of the time I'm driving regular sedans and dull SUVs. So, while there was a lot to look forward to with the 2014 Acura MDX's arrival -- it's handsome new design, jewel-like full LED headlamps, and the promise of updated tech, for example -- the reality was that I was fully prepared to be just a bit bored this week.

And then I hit the road, curiously tapped the button for the Lane Keeping Assist system, and was met with one of the weirdest drives of my life.

Advanced, awkward, awesome
The MDX's midtier Technology package adds a number of passive driver aid technologies, such as a blind-spot-monitoring system, a forward collision warning system, and a lane departure warning system. Each of these systems will chide you with visual and audible alerts, letting you know that there's potential danger -- such as merging into a lane that's currently occupied or drifting out of your current lane because of inattentiveness -- but they don't actively intervene in any way.

However, the MDX's top-tier option package and trim level, the MDX Advance, adds active intervention abilities to the passive driver aid features of the Technology package. Forward collision alert becomes a Collision Mitigation Braking System that can automatically engage the brakes to slow the vehicle before an imminent collision, reducing the force and severity of the impact. Cruise control becomes Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) with a low-speed follow feature that allows it to maintain a safe following distance with the leading vehicle all the way down to a complete stop and resume its speed when the lead vehicle moves. The standard rearview camera gets front and rear parking proximity sensors.

We've seen a number of these technologies before, but things get interesting when the lane departure warning becomes a Lane Keeping Assist, arguably the weirdest feature in the MDX's bag of tricks.

By processing the road ahead of the vehicle with a forward-facing camera, Lane Keeping Assist is able to discern the lane marker lines and calculate where the MDX is between them. It then is able to nudge the vehicle left or right to keep it centered in the lane. However, where other lane-keeping systems that we've tested only keep you from leaving your lane and pull this trick off with biased braking, Acura's system works to keep you centered in the lane before you get out of bounds and influences the vehicle's direction through electronic power steering. The weird bit is that you can feel all of this happening as you hold the wheel.

To get an idea of what driving with Lane Keeping Assist activated feels like right now, grab a friend and hop in your car. Once under way, have your friend put two fingers on top of the steering wheel and tell him to help you steer in tandem. Now, he's only got two fingers on the wheel and you've got two hands at 3 and 9, so you can easily overpower him and retain control of the vehicle. You'll both be looking at the same road and working toward the same goal of keeping the car from careening off of the road, so you'll stay fairly centered in your lane. However, your inputs will be just slightly out of sync. You'll be able to feel his tiny corrections, sometimes working with you and sometimes against. This is what Lane Keeping Assist feels like, and it's very off-putting at first.

2014 MDX Acura

With the aid of cameras, the MDX can keep itself centered within its lane.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

My initial reaction to Lane Keeping Assist was revulsion. I was very vocal to the other Car Tech editors about disliking the feeling that the car was fighting me to stay in the lane. However, I forced myself to drive for hours with the Assist engaged -- completing the entirety of my 120-mile loop of the San Francisco Bay Area -- and found that, after a while, I got used to it. And I noticed a few things.

First, the system didn't seem to be able to make large corrections, such as following a bend in the road or it's assistance wasn't strong enough to push far enough past my hands' neutral position to affect a large turn. It's only got enough freedom to keep you centered in the lane. I also noticed that if you let go of the steering wheel while Lane Keeping Assist is active, you can actually see the wheel move as it makes small corrections to keep the car straight for a few moments. However, once the system realizes that you're not helping, it will flash a Steering Input Required warning before deactivating assistance. Presumably, this is to keep drivers from engaging the system and taking a nap while the MDX drives from San Francisco to LA. The car can't quite drive itself, despite the fact that sometimes it feels like it wants to.

Lane Keeping Assist is a small, but awesome, step toward the self-driving car that automakers have been promising us. Though, at the end of the day, I'd rather do the driving by myself and unassisted, but I'm a bit of a control freak like that.

Engine and economy
Disable the electronic assists and you'll find that the MDX's electronic power steering is not bad at all. In fact, I was very impressed. The level of assist can be adjusted on the fly by the driver with a button on the center console labeled IDS or Integrated Dynamics System.

Tapping this button toggles between Sport, Normal, and Comfort modes. I found that, when in its Sport setting, the steering had a nice weight to it that was pleasing, with a good level of resistance to my inputs. Road feeling through the fingertips was next to nil, but I enjoyed the responsiveness. Sport was the mode that I preferred, but drivers who like effortless steering can toggle to the Normal or Comfort modes for a progressively lighter feeling.

Engine bay

Somewhere beneath the plastic shrouding is a new V-6 engine that's sometimes an I-3.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

Lift the Acura's hood and use your imagination to see beyond the sea of plastic covers and you'll find a 290-hp, 3.5-liter V-6 engine. Torque is stated at 267 pound-feet thanks to a combination of direct injection, Acura/Honda's i-VTEC variable valve timing, and lift control. This engine is down a bit in displacement and down a just few ponies, but it's also up where efficiency is concerned. Thanks to a technology called VCM or Variable Cylinder Management, the MDX's V-6 is able to shut down some of its cylinders, effectively becoming an I-3, for increased fuel economy during passages where the full capabilities of its engine aren't needed, such as when cruising on a flat highway.

Fuel economy is estimated by the EPA at 20 city, 28 highway, and 23 combined. I managed to maintain about 25 mpg during my highway-heavy test period.

The engine is transversely mounted -- hinting at its front-wheel driven roots -- and is mated to a six-speed automatic transmission that features normal, sport, and manual "SportShift" modes. Sport mode actually adds a bit of engagement to the drive, holding the revs higher in the range before shifting to better access available power. However, the manual shift mode, controlled by steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters, isn't particularly sporty thanks to a noticeable lag between slapping a paddle and the resulting shift.

Rear wheels

SH-AWD can shift as much as 70 percent of torque to the outside rear wheel to aid in cornering.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

The MDX's platform may be a front-driver, but our example was equipped with Acura's optional Super Handling All-Wheel Drive (SH-AWD) system, which can send as much as 70 percent of available torque to the rear wheels when extra grip is needed or as little as 10 percent when cruising. The "Super Handling" portion of SH-AWD comes into play when cornering when rear axle torque vectoring can shuffle torque between the two rear wheels, sending power to the outside rear wheel to help rotate the vehicle when accelerating out of a corner. You can watch all of this torque shifting and shuffling between the four wheels on an LCD in the MDX's instrument cluster.

Read More

Friday, October 25, 2013

Microsoft gives Bing a makeover

Bing's newly redesigned home page.

(Credit: Microsoft)

Microsoft is giving its Bing search engine an overhaul to better compete with Google.

Like Yahoo earlier this month, Microsoft unveiled a redesigned logo for its search engine, along with a refreshed, modern homepage design. But Microsoft's changes go beyond the cosmetic by introducing new features and tweaking existing ones.

One of the keys to Microsoft's new approach is Page Zero, a new search function that aims to help users get a useful response to their query before they even see a traditional search results page. Building on to the traditional autofill suggestion that appears as users type their queries, Bing will also instantly provide relevant information and options for exploration as users input their query.

"For example, if you type Katy Perry, we understand what you're looking for before you've even searched and give you a quick glance of who she is and suggest other popular search tasks associated with the singer," Lawrence Ripsher, Microsoft's general manager of user experiences at Bing, explained late Monday in a company blog post detailing Bing's new features.

For "high-confidence" queries, in which it's certain it has clear data related to a user's intent, Microsoft has created a new area at the top of the page called Pole Position. The new feature presents detailed information such as current weather conditions in a particular city in larger, integrated presentation at the top of the page.

The site is also making modifications to Snapshots, the at-a-glance answers to queries about people, places, and things introduced last year. The redesigned feature has been combined with Sidebar, which provides Knowledge Graph-like information from users' social network contacts.

The new combination is designed to "provide people with all the supporting context they'll need for any given query:"

For example, consider a search for "Highway 1". Bing knows there are many possible things you might be looking for. Our new design displays both the factual data about this beautiful route (length, date, related places), and also the human perspective whether they be status updates, photos, tweets, check-in's or expert opinions.

Bing's new logo.

(Credit: Microsoft)

A new logo for the search engine is also part of the company's strategy of spotlighting Bing as being the baked-in search engine that powers a variety of Microsoft products, including Office and Windows 8.1. The strategy shift is aimed at closing the gap with Google, which in August accounted for almost 67 percent of U.S. searches compared with Microsoft's 17.9 percent, according to market researcher ComScore.

Read More

ZTE Nubia 5

Though ZTE has plenty of low- and midrange devices under its belt, the number of high-end handsets that it releases for the US are few and far between. So when the Chinese-based manufacturer launched the impressively souped-up Nubia 5 and made it available to US consumers online and through Amazon, needless to say, I was excited.

Compared with ZTE's most recent top-tier phone, the Sprint Vital, the Nubia 5 shows marked improvements: a faster processor, a slimmer profile, and a higher-resolution screen to name a few.

The device does have a couple of drawbacks, however. For example, it lacks LTE capabilities, and offers only 16GB of storage (which turns out to be about 9GB or so left of usable storage) without any option to expand.

But while these factors may keep the handset from being wholly comparable to the current flagships of other, more successful manufacturers (not to mention there's the highly anticipated Nexus 5 to factor in as well, which is expected to be as unlocked and global-ready as its predecessor), the phone still performs great, is reasonably priced at $450, and is a working testament to ZTE's determination to make a serious name for itself in the US.

Design
The Nubia 5 has solid, high-end build quality. Though its aesthetic is nothing we haven't seen before (in fact, it uncannily looks like HTC handsets of recent past, like the Droid DNA or the Butterfly 2), I like its matte, rubberlike back, and the faux-metallic trimming along the phone's sides. Those accents lend a professional feel, and the way the top edge slightly tapers off is also a nice detail.

The device weighs 4.51 ounces, and measures 5.43 inches tall and 2.7 inches wide. It has a slim 0.29-inch profile. If you're like me and have a small grip, you may find the phone hard to maneuver with just one hand. True, the handset isn't noticeably any bigger than some others on the market, like the Samsung Galaxy S4, but it may seem somewhat tall inside certain pockets.

On the left and right edges are a narrow volume rocker and sleep/power button, respectively. Because both keys sit rather flush with the surface of the Nubia, it's difficult to find them by feeling around. Up top is a 3.5mm headphone jack and on the bottom edge is a Micro-USB port for charging.

The Nubia 5 has a trim, 0.29-inch profile.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

The back of the smartphone houses a 13-megapixel camera with flash and two small clusters of perforations for the audio speakers. The camera lens, accented with a stylish red rim, bulges slightly outward from the surface. Because you can't disassemble the back, the 2,300mAh battery is nonremovable.

Equipped with a 5-inch IPS touch screen, the device's display is one of the sharpest I've seen on any ZTE handset. It has a 1,920x1,080-pixel resolution and 443ppi, so HD videos and images appeared crisp, and colors were accurately portrayed. Menu icons and text looked smooth, and the screen had a satisfyingly wide viewing angle. In addition, an issue I've often had with ZTE phones is finding their touch screens less responsive than they should be. The Nubia's display was sensitive and responsive to the touch; typing was accurate and tapping on items was a breeze.

However, the display could be brighter. Though it's indiscernible on a day-to-day basis, it was notable when I saw how much dimmer a video or a swatch of white looked on maximum brightness compared with on the GS4 and the LG G2.

Above the display is a 2-megapixel camera, and below it are three hot keys that light up red when in use. Although it's obvious that the middle circle button is the home key (which you can also long-press to launch recent apps), the other two keys are just small red dots, and their meanings aren't immediately clear. To clarify: the left calls up settings and the right is the Back key.

Software features
The Nubia 5 features ZTE's MiFavor (pronounced "my favor") user interface. Though I prefer the simple elegance of vanilla Android, MiFavor looks nice: you can choose between a black and a white color theme, and the icons and menus are simple, but sleek. In fact, I like this UI more than the somewhat immature aesthetic of LG's Optimus 3.0 UI.

Oddly enough, the device doesn't feature an app drawer. Instead, you'll find all your apps in the pages of your home screen, where you can also organize individual app folders. While iOS users may not have any trouble with this, Android users will definitely find this inconvenient. The drawer allows users to have a clean, uncluttered homepage. Without it, your homepage will begin piling up with apps, and you'll inevitably end up having to swipe through several pages or create numerous folders just to get to them all.

ZTE Nubia 5 (homepage)

No app drawer here: similar to in iOS, all apps will be accessible only through the home page.

(Credit: Lynn La/CNET)

The device runs Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean and includes the regular mill of Google apps you come to expect: YouTube, Search, portals to the Play Store for Books, Games, Magazines, Movies & TV, and Music, Chrome, Maps, G+ Photos, Hangouts, Gmail, and Google+.

You'll also get basic apps such as native browser and e-mail clients, a calendar, a notepad, a clock with alarm and stopwatch functions, a news and weather app, video and music players, a sound recorder, and a calculator.

ZTE also threw in some extra goodies, like an FM radio and a flashlight, a Smart Tag app that works in conjunction with the phone's NFC capabilities, Twitter, Facebook, the Kingsoft Office mobile office suite, Evernote, Dropbox, and the WeChat messaging app.

The phone has Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity, 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of ROM. Unfortunately, there is no expandable microSD card slot, so unless you start getting into cloud computing or transfer out your Nubia's contents every so often, there's the (likely) chance you'll run out of storage. Especially since those 16GB end up being more like 9GB of usable, formatted memory.

Camera and video
The device's 13-megapixel camera features a Konica Minolta sapphire lens and image stabilization. Though ZTE has made handsets with a 13-megapixel shooter before with the Sprint Vital, the Nubia's photo quality was much better. Check out the photos below and be sure to click each one for the full-resolution version.

ZTE Nubia 5 (indoor)

Even given the dim lighting, cups and other objects inside this Starbucks still come out clear.

(Credit: Lynn La/CNET)
ZTE Nubia 5 (outdoor)

In this outdoor photo, these blown-glass figures are vibrant and sharp.

(Credit: Lynn La/CNET)
ZTE Nubia 5 (closeup)

A close-up photo of this flower-print scarf shows plenty of detail.

(Credit: Lynn La/CNET)
ZTE Nubia 5 (SSI)

In our standard studio shot, you can see the flash gives a blue cast to the white background, but objects remain well-defined.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

For one thing, the camera operated much quicker (though if you're shooting in HDR mode, you will have to wait awhile for image processing), and images were well-defined and in focus. Though there is no obvious macro zooming function, close-up shots turned out detailed and sharp. Moreover, colors had more pop and were more accurate than with the Vital, and images taken in dimmer lighting still came out less grainy or "crunchy-looking."

Read More

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Get a 60-inch LG plasma HDTV for $699.99

The LG 60PN5300 is a bare-bones 60-inch plasma, but it's also insanely cheap.

The LG 60PN5300 is a bare-bones 60-inch plasma, but it's also insanely cheap.

(Credit: Dell)

Christmas shoppers still have two months to find the ultimate family gift, but for those of us who gather 'round the menorah, there's barely a month left. (Chanukah falls really early this year.)

If the family's been clamoring for a bigger TV -- what, you're still making them sit through Super Bowls on a 42-incher?! -- here's one of the better deals I've seen.

For a limited time, and while supplies last, Best Buy has the LG 60PN5300 60-inch plasma HDTV for $699.99 (plus tax), with free in-store pickup. (At this writing, shipping was listed as free but not available.)

Now, in my neck of the woods, sales tax will bump that total to around $742, at which point it might be better to consider Dell's deal on the same TV: the LG 60PN5300 for $749.99 shipped, plus a $150 Dell gift card. Sales tax still applies in many (most?) states, but the gift card definitely helps even things out. Use it for a printer, tablet, or whatnot.

The LG 60PN5300 is a 60-inch(!) plasma with a one-year overall warranty and two-year panel warranty. It's a budget-minded model, to be sure, with only two HDMI inputs and no apps or other "smart" features. (It does have an Ethernet port, but that's most likely for firmware updates.)

I'll admit I'm not wild about the HDMI situation. That's enough for, say, cable and Roku boxes, but what if you also want to connect a game console? Or Blu-ray player? Now you're going to need an HDMI switch box and all the hassles that go with it. If you've got a lot of stuff you want to plug in, consider another TV. (For shame, LG. On a panel of this size, three ports at a bare minimum.)

CNET hasn't reviewed this model, but 123 Best Buy customers collectively rated it 4.5 stars out of 5, and PC Mag awarded it 3.5 stars. I mention that because professional reviewers tend to be tougher on TVs than real-world users, and obviously the latter consider it a fairly outstanding model.

That said, if you're looking for something a little more robust (and don't like plasmas), Groupon has the LG 60LS5750 60-inch LED HDTV for $1,099.99 shipped -- still a great deal on a huge TV. (Rakuten sells it for $1,553.31.) It's fairly loaded: 120Hz refresh rate, built-in Wi-Fi, and loads of apps.

As we all know, TV is better than the movies. (Yeah, I said it.) So why not go big when you go home?

Bonus deal: Still paying your cable company a monthly modem-rental fee? You don't have to. Just buy your own modem; eventually you'll recoup the costs, and you'll save over the long run. For a limited time, and while supplies last, Newegg has the Motorola SurfBoard SB6121 cable modem for $68 shipped when you apply coupon code EMCWXVS64 at checkout. And when you do, you'll also get a free D-Link DIR-601 802.11n router! Note that you must be a Newegg newsletter subscriber to use the code.

Deals found on The Cheapskate are subject to availability, expiration, and other terms determined by sellers.

Curious about what exactly The Cheapskate does and how it works? Read our FAQ.

Read More

Qualcomm adds new high-tech luster to lowly electrical wires

The HomePlug standard is designed to convert homes' electrical wires into a high-speed network that can reach throughout homes better than Wi-Fi.

The HomePlug standard is designed to convert homes' electrical wires into a high-speed network that can reach throughout homes better than Wi-Fi.

(Credit: HomePlug Alliance)

AMSTERDAM -- Electrical wires hardly have the glamor of 4G mobile networks or invisibly small microchip transistors. But Qualcomm hopes a faster new version of technology called HomePlug will breathe new high-tech life into homes' old wiring.

Qualcomm's Atheros division makes processors that let devices such as set-top boxes and wireless network range extenders communicate over power lines using HomePlug. A new chip, the QCA7500 announced here this week at the Broadband World Forum, can take advantage of a HomePlug AV2 feature called MIMO (multiple-input and multiple-output) to boost data-transfer speeds up to 1 gigabit per second.

The HomePlug AV2 standard, which arrived last year, boosted speeds by broadening the signal spectrum to a range of 30Hz to 86Hz. The MIMO upgrade to AV2 increases speeds more by taking advantage of most power plug's third prong. Without MIMO, only two prongs are used, which means a single pair of electrical lines, but with MIMO, there are three pairs of wires that can carry signals.

First-gen HomePlug technology arrived on the market more than six years ago with speeds reaching only 200Mbps, then three years ago got a boost to 500Mbps, said Todd Antes, vice president of marketing for Qualcomm Atheros's networking business unit. But the key aspect with the new technology is not so much the peak speeds available at plugs with a strong link, but instead a speed boost for the plugs that have the feebler connections. That means people can install data-hogging devices like DVRs and TVs in whatever room they want, Antes said.

HomePlug's existing limit of about 30Mbps at the worst plug is no longer acceptable with the arrival of high-resolution 4K video, Antes said.

"We're starting to see 50Mbps or 75Mbps starting to be the new requirement for every plug," Antes said. "With MIMO's additional bandwidth, we think AV2 shows we'll be able to get to 60, 70, or 80Mbps minimum. At your best plug in the home, you'll see hundreds of megabits. We think it's a great backbone technology."

HomePlug has caught on well in Europe, where Wi-Fi signals are less likely to be able to penetrate homes' older, heavier-duty construction materials. Some Internet service providers, such as Free in France, don't even give customers a choice: the home router gets its power from a HomePlug-enabled power cord that also sends data to a HomePlug-enabled set-top box.

Antes thinks HomePlug could catch on better in the United States, too, for example with range extenders to help people bring Wi-Fi coverage to rooms that the main wireless access point can't reach.

HomePlug also could be useful for people buying electric vehicles. When owners get home, they can plug the car in and it can sync music playlists, coordinate charging, or otherwise use the home network.

Read More

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

The perils of being 'the car guy'

Recently I was at a friend's house party. This in itself isn't unusual, but the fact I was having a genuinely good time certainly was.

The atmosphere was convivial, the canapes moreish, and the company engaging, but there was more to it than that. For the first time ever, I was recognised by someone I didn't know.

"You're the car guy, aren't you?" suddenly exclaimed the female partner of the couple I'd been chatting to. "You drive around in lots of nice cars -- wow, it's great to meet you. What are you in tonight?"

I did my best to hide my all-too-apparent embarrassment by describing the Firenze Red Defender sat outside, catching a glimpse of my reflection and noticing my cheeks had turned a similar shade to the Land Rover.

I also became acutely aware that everyone else within earshot of the conversation had turned to hang on my every word about the Landie's cramped cabin and phenomenal go-anywhere ability. Even my gag about towing the Pennines farther north raised a titter.

"So this is what it's like to feel like a celebrity?" I mused mentally.

I'd have to be careful here, because I was getting so deep into my whole repartee about the fastest, most expensive, largest, most frugal vehicles I'd piloted that I almost wouldn't have noticed my phone ringing from the guys at Iceland's advertising agency offering me the chance to promote prawn rings.

Abruptly, the amusing anecdotes and general jollity ended, and as silence reigned, my audience of information-hungry, newbie motoring enthusiasts waited with baited breath for my measured response. Except there wasn't to be a moment of enlightenment from my answer for I had been asked that question. You know the one...

"What's your favourite car, then?"

"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH."

It might have been conjured out of well-meaning inquisitiveness, but for a car guy, there isn't as answer. How can there possibly be one answer?

"I don't have one," I reported.

"Oh, you must do!"

"No, I really don't. Do you have a favourite colour?"

"Yes, but..."

"Then why aren't all your clothes that colour then?"

The quietness that filled the air was broken seconds later by a hushed "aaah" of understanding from the collected guests, before they returned to their prior conversations and I was left to talk about anything other than cars.

Sure, I could have made something up. I'd have mentioned the Citroen SM, but so few would know what I was on about that I'd have just sounded like a geek. And I couldn't say anything too new or obvious or I wouldn't have sounded anoraky, enough and my credibility and allure would have ended up down the waste disposal unit along with a sausage roll that had been on the floor.

No, I stood firm, and spoke from the heart. Next time you hear someone give a definitive answer to that question, you know a car guy he ain't.

Read More

Get your PC back in shape with AVG PC TuneUp 2014

AVG, one of the most trusted sources for virus and malware protection, has recently released the all-new PC TuneUp 2014 to help you speed up any computer. A comprehensive utility kit, PC TuneUp offers 35 tools to return your PC to tip-top shape in one convenient package. With new features such as Live Optimization and Program Deactivator, PC TuneUp will work in the background to keep your computer responsive when you need it to be.

Get peak performance for your PC! AVG PC TuneUp 2014 is an all-in-one optimization program that fine-tunes your PC for maximum performance. It reduces PC freezes and crashes, extends your battery life, removes duplicate files, data clutter, and other junk to free up valuable disk space -- and securely and permanently deletes sensitive data so it can never fall into the wrong hands. It's the easiest way to jumpstart an aging PC.

Main Features:

  • The new Dashboard helps spot PC problems more easily and recommends optimization steps.
  • Flight Mode turns off power-hungry features like Bluetooth and Wi-Fi devices.
  • Enhanced Automatic Cleaning Updates helps clean up more programs.
  • Enhanced Disk Cleaner gets rid of leftover data.
  • Duplicate Finder safely gets rid of this wasteful, duplicate data.

If you've been wondering why your old machine isn't running as fast as it used to, PC TuneUp's trial will let you detect and repair problems without having to spend a dime. Get the full power of one of the best optimizers available on Download.com -- absolutely free. Should you decide that you want to keep the comprehensive care of PC TuneUp beyond the test period, you can now get the optimizer for 50 percent off, at a special promotional price of $19.99 (Orig. $39.99) -- exclusively on Download.com. PC TuneUp supports Windows XP, Vista, 7, and 8 and is now fully compatible with the all-new Win 8.1. This special offer will last for one week and ends at 11:59 P.M. PST, Tuesday, Oct. 29.



Read More

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Future Firefox to deactivate most plug-ins by default

Firefox will ask users whether they want to run browser plug-ins such as Microsoft's Silverlight or Apple's QuickTime. The browser can be set to always permit a particular Web site to run a particular plug-in.

Firefox will ask users whether they want to run browser plug-ins such as Microsoft's Silverlight or Apple's QuickTime. The browser can be set to always permit a particular Web site to run a particular plug-in.

(Credit: Mozilla)

Mozilla has dealt another blow to the use of plug-ins to extend browser abilities, keeping all but Flash Player deactivated by default in a version of Firefox now under development.

With the click-to-run plug-in feature, announced in January, plug-ins such as Silverlight and QuickTime won't run unless the user authorize it when a Web page using them loads. That feature now is built into the Aurora version of Firefox that will grow into the final release in coming weeks. The plug-in hurdle doesn't apply to Adobe Systems' Flash Player, by far the most widely installed and used plug-in, though it can be set to not run by default, also.

Mozilla's move is a new step in browser makers' efforts to rid the Web of plug-ins. They were useful in a time when browsers themselves rarely got new programming interfaces for new features, but now they're seen as a security and stability risk, which is why Chrome will begin barring many plug-ins starting in January 2014 and Microsoft banished plug-ins from Internet Explorer running on the new Windows 8 interface. Like Mozilla and Google, Microsoft carved out an exception for Flash, but others including Google Talk, Java, and Adobe Acrobat will require permission.

"Plug-ins are now a legacy technology," said Benjamin Smedberg, Mozilla's engineering manager for stability and plug-ins, in a blog post Tuesday. "Plug-ins used to be an important tool for prototyping and implementing new features such as video and animation. As browsers have advanced, this kind of feature development can occur directly within the browser using technologies such as WebGL, WebSockets, WebRTC, and asm.js."

Even those who like plug-ins can't use them in the fast-growing market of mobile devices.

Programmers should start weaning themselves from reliance on plug-ins, shifting instead to Web standards built directly into browsers, Smedberg said.

"If there are plug-in features which are not available in the Web platform, we encourage developers to post their use cases to mozilla.dev.platform project list, so that Mozilla can prioritize Web platform work to make those use cases possible," he said.

Read More
Powered By Blogger · Designed By Tech News